Dr. Harrison Exposes Anne Dachel’s Inept Evidence on Age of Autism
Oct 01, 2015
Every Child By Two is pleased to launch another article in their Expert Commentary series which will be referenced here on Shot of Prevention with links to the in-depth articles available on the Every Child By Two website. This series features guest writer Joel A. Harrison, PhD, MPH, a retired epidemiologist who has worked in the areas of preventive medicine, infectious diseases, medical outcomes research, and evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Dr. Harrison volunteers his time to provide in-depth and expert analysis of articles which ultimately make false claims about the safety of vaccines. Today we will feature Dr. Harrison’s latest paper, Deficient Science, Hypocrisy & Bogus Arguments: Two Articles by Age of Autism’s Anne Dachel.
by Joel A. Harrison, PhD, MPH
Over the past several decades, a number of bloggers and organizations have claimed that vaccines and/or their ingredients cause a number of disorders, foremost among these is autism. The results of their efforts have been a decline in vaccine coverage and a rise in previously rare childhood diseases resulting in unnecessary suffering, hospitalizations, long-term disabilities, and even death.
Anne Dachel is a regular contributor and Media Editor for Age of Autism.
In two recent Age of Autism articles, “Dachel Media Update: Willingham Wanders Into Waldo” and “Dachel Media Update: Forbes’ Emily Willingham Has Made Up Your Mind”, Dachel criticizes several articles by Emily Willingham, a science writer at Forbes. As this paper will show, from Dachel’s own articles it is clear:
- Dachel literally doesn’t understand epidemiology and causal inference.
- Dachel displays poor scholarship in claiming that vaccine supporters rely solely on epidemiological studies, missing the numerous references to animal and other research types.
- Dachel is hypocritical in criticizing epidemiological studies while promoting/advocating for an epidemiological study comparing never vaccinated to vaccinated.
- Dachel resorts to a typical logical fallacy, ad hominem attacks.
- Dachel is hypocritical to imply, with NO credible evidence, that Emily Willingham is a “pharma shill“ by stating “Emily Willingtoworkforpharmaaham’s version is below” while she proudly refers to her own for-profit sponsor.
- Dachel’s approach is great propaganda for the uninformed; but not a valid scholarly approach. In neither of her articles does Dachel actually address what Willingham writes. Dachel could have directly critiqued each of the points Willingham made, including specific information from the writings she mentions; but she didn’t. Instead, Dachel refers to writings that Willingham may or may not have read. Using Dachel’s approach one could critique just about any article by throwing in a reference to another article or book without giving any details.
- Dachel, like many antivaccinationists, takes the approach that people are guilty until proven innocent or, perhaps, guilty with no possibility of proving innocence. However, it is a basic American principle to be considered innocent until proven guilty.
In my articles published by Every Child By Two, I have reviewed and critiqued several articles posted on Age of Autism and SafeMinds, one of Age of Autism’s sponsors. Each of my reviews has clearly highlighted the poor scholarship, deficient science, and, often, lack of common sense used by the authors of those articles that render their opinion void of any credibility. This article, which reviews some of Anne Dachel’s articles on Emily Willingham is yet another example that adds hypocrisy to the growing list of antivaccinationist flaws.
If people, especially parents, are to decide on whether or not to vaccinate themselves and their children, such decisions should be based on science and logic (critical thinking) and not belief systems deficient in both.
Click here to begin reading Dr. Harrison’s latest expert commentary, Deficient Science, Hypocrisy & Bogus Arguments: Two Articles by Age of Autism’s Anne Dachel.
Check out Dr. Harrison’s previous articles as well, to include;
- Wrong About Measles, Cancer & Autism: A Review of Dan Olmsted’s Article “Weekly Wrap: Measles, Cancer, Autoimmunity, Autism”
- Don’t Sacrifice The Good For The Perfect: A Review of Cathy Jameson’s “A Strong Message About Vaccines”
Wrong About Genetic Research & Autism: Teresa Conrick’s “Dear America, You Are Being Bamboozled”
Wrong About Genetic Research & Autism: Lyn Redwood’s “Science as a Means of Social Control”
- Wrong About Vaccine Safety: A Review of Andrew Wakefield’s “Callous Disregard”
You can read Dr. Harrison’s complete Biography and Mission Statement here.
Be sure to subscribe to Shot of Prevention to receive updates when Dr. Harrison publishes future articles to the Every Child By Two Expert Commentary series.
Please note: The opinions in this article reflect the views of the author who is not an employee of Every Child By Two and do not necessarily reflect the views of Every Child By Two. Dr. Harrison volunteers his time to provide in-depth, well-researched analysis of articles which ultimately make false claims about the safety of vaccines. His articles are summarized here on Shot of Prevention with links to the full response on the Every Child By Two website.
This post was originally published with MediaPlanet in the FutureOfPersonalHealth.com Winter Wellness Issue, and was written by Vaccinate Your Family. Are you more likely to get sick during the winter? Yep – more viruses...
You probably know someone who has gotten sick with RSV (Respiratory Syncytial Virus) given the number of cases in the U.S. this fall and winter season. While the recent RSV surge has made headlines, this...
Leave a Reply