Home > Parent Perspective, Preventable Diseases, Vaccine Myths > Mommy Bloggers “Babble” About Vaccines (Part 2)

Mommy Bloggers “Babble” About Vaccines (Part 2)

Yesterday I commented on an article that appeared in Babble’s blog entitled “The Worst Things People Say About Unvaccinated Kids”.

Today, I want to draw your attention to a follow-up article that also appeared in Babble entitled, “Why You Should Vaccinate Your Kids”. 

Given the title, let me just say that I had high hopes for this piece.  While the article is well-intentioned, it unfortunately lacks conviction and concrete evidence.

In this post the author, Sierra Black, who admits to having delayed vaccines, emphasizes that immunizations are not just a personal choice, but a public health issue, as well as a privilege.  She acknowledges that in the two years she delayed vaccines for her daughter, she was relying on the herd immunity of a well-vaccinated community. She also highlights a larger view as she touches upon the cost-benefit of vaccines, as well as the complex economics of vaccine production in helping developing nations to reduce the incidence of disease.

While the article makes an effort to support vaccination, in the end the message fails to deliver a strong impact.  Shortly after making the point that vaccinating is for the good of the community, she then suggests that “Good parents need to weigh their risks and options, and ultimately need to choose what’s right for their family.”  While it appears that the author is being compassionate and doesn’t want to criticize parents for making their own vaccination decisions, this desire to have every parent “feel right about this personal decision” negates her stance that vaccines are about public health.

It may not be fair, but there are times when public policy has had to override personal beliefs in this country.  Unfortunately, for people like Sierra and many others, this can be difficult to endorse in today’s society – especially when many people feel their personal liberties take precedence over public policy.  Fortunately, we have the overwhelming convictions of doctors, scientists and immunization experts who continue to speak out in favor of vaccination.  While parents do have a choice regarding vaccines, public health officials remain hopeful that these parental decisions will be based on sound science and not just gut emotion.

In one instance, Sierra states that vaccines “are safer than you think”.  While her intent is to calm fears of a doubting public, her assumption is that everyone has the same opinions regarding safety.  However, in my experiences on this blog and on the Vaccinate Your Baby Facebook page, I have encountered plenty of parents, as well as many doctors and immunization specialists, who already feel that vaccines are safe  - safer of course than the alternative – disease!

While it’s nice to add Sierra’s commentary to the mix, and I commend her for speaking out, I felt that  another article, entitled, “7 Reasons You Shouldn’t Refuse or Delay Vaccinations”, by Julie Ryan Evans, on Cafe Mom’s The Stir, was much more effective in communicating the importance of timely vaccinations.

In this piece, the author explains how she is always searching for information to relieve her worries and help ensure she is doing the right thing by vaccinating.  She admits that she is “stuck somewhere in the middles of the debate”, so she seeks the advice of Dr. Jana Shaw, a mother and physician who is also a member of the New York State Department of Health Immunization Expert Panel and she presents this doctor’s advice for general “fodder”.

Way to go Julie!

Hopefully more parents will follow Julie’s lead.  She was able to distinguish between sound medical advice based on scientific evidence, and the emotional impressions that appear to contribute to her vaccine hesitancy.  This type of article illustrates that many parents, like Julie, seek to gather information from immunization experts and other reputable sources, which is very encouraging indeed.

So, in comparison to the myths about the unvaccinated, how well to you think these articles did in presenting another perspective on vaccinations?  If you’re someone who is “on the fence”, did you find that either of these articles presented any compelling reasons for you to favor vaccination?

  1. July 24, 2011 at 5:52 am | #1

    Unfortunately, most parents don’t realise that so-called “immunization experts” are blindly repeating what they have been told by other similarly brainwashed experts. Parents need to ask themselves where the sense is in poisoning a baby to keep it healthy. The truth is that vaccination has been a fraud from the very beginning, ist still and will always be a fraud.

  2. Chris
    July 24, 2011 at 4:15 pm | #2

    Do tell us how the toxins the bacteria that cause tetanus, pertussis and diphtheria are so much safer than the DTaP. Provide something more scientific than your opinion, especially in light of your past performance of thinking an obviously faked chart was real because you liked what it said.

  3. Venna
    July 25, 2011 at 10:38 am | #3

    Mr. Alber

    If you haven’t ever experienced being brain washed, you can’t really speak about it in any real terms. Science shows us that vaccines prevent disease and while there are rare occurrences of serious reaction, for the public at large, most of the time there is no reaction or it will be mild. If you haven’t suffered through a vaccine preventable disease, you also can’t speak as to which is worse, suffering the disease or getting a small poke with a needle. You position in this particular topic is unsubstantiated and unsupportable by real science.

  4. Twyla
    August 8, 2011 at 3:12 am | #4

    re: “public health officials remain hopeful that these parental decisions will be based on sound science and not just gut emotion”

    Unfortunately, there are a lot of gaps in vaccine science.

    Here is an interesting article about how little we really know about early life immune challenges: http://passionlessdrone.wordpress.com/2009/05/13/a-brief-overview-on-early-life-immune-challenges-and-why-they-might-matter/

    We do not have good studies on how many vaccines are safe to be given at once, and how many are safe to be given over the first two years of life. We do not have studies comparing long-term health outcomes in vaccinated and unvaccinated populations — retrospective studies in humans, prospective studies in animals.

    Show me some studies of vaccine injured children. Do such studies exist? We need to understand why these adverse reactions occur, who is more susceptible, and how to treat these vaccine reactions.

    Read chapter 7 of the book Vaccine Epidemic on the need for more research.

  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 331 other followers